The given three maps provide information about West Park Secondary School established in 1950 which was refurbished in two different periods (1980 and 2010)
Overall, it is crystal clear that there was no changes in the location of main road while all other communities were developed in given all time periods.
It can be clearly seen that in 1958 in which was used for agriculture purpose had been covered for sports field in 1980 followed by residential area constructed in the front of the farmland in 1950, replaced in order to establish a car park which had half space of living area and remained half was used for extending School region including science block which was constructed in the west side of main building in 1980. However, there were no changes regarding playground.
Moving further, after 30 years of refurbishment in 2010, westpark Secondary School was again modernized. As a result, the car park area was expanded which removed sports field for constructing in the half area of playground. Further, School region was not touched in the same period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d half space of living area and remained half was used for extending School regio...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, second, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02793296089 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67695133963 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59217877095 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 139.026076691 43.030603864 323% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 150.0 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8333333333 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134963069537 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679822061292 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0329108319518 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0921941201611 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391587427156 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.2329268293 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.49 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 29.5 11.4329268293 258% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.