The given map illustrated information on West Park secondary School education this manufacturing in 1950. In this map information on destruction and rebuild new block.
Since, 1950 there are approximately equally distributed land on houses, school, farmland and playground and two spot touched with main road is school and residence house. After 30 year home are and farmland accomplished fall down and house space they build-out carpark and science block. Farmland spot reconstruction on development sports filed. Additionally, primary school in 1950 after 30 year this building is main building of school and playground space in not changed, but 1980 majority growth given on sports area. I. 2010 only main building and science block no changed other spaces are completely destructed and more priority give them car parking area and sports filed include in playground area.
To conclude, early 19th century there are only four place and lot of area covered and 1980 and 2010 they are particular are more priority given them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 63, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'lot' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'lots'.
Suggestion: lots
...h century there are only four place and lot of area covered and 1980 and 2010 they ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, second
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 870.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33742331288 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75530481402 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60736196319 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6549836566 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.75 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.375 5.23603664747 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137855369225 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648888719149 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646580608662 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0940783443679 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567079242336 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.