The diagram below show the water supply system in Australia at present and in future

Essay topics:

The diagram below show the water supply system in Australia at present and in future.

The diagrams gives information about, existing source of water supply in Australia and the strategy of the upcoming years.
Overall, it can be from both the diagrams that the main change in water supply system was recycling of water in the city. In future none of the water will be released to the river.
The current water supply system, the water is stored in a dame before it is used in the city for the use of household, factories and shops. The waste water produced form the city is the shifted to the water treatment plant which is then drive to the sea. The water produced by the storms are directly allowed to the sea.
On the other hand the future water supply system, it can be seen from the diagram that dame is used to store the water this pure is supplied to the city and the uses of it in a city are same as before. Moreover, the storm water and waste water are released in to the water treatment plant which is purified in the plant and once again the pure water is taken in the city for the usage.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 14, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'give'.
Suggestion: give
The diagrams gives information about, existing source of w...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 255, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...t plant which is then drive to the sea. The water produced by the storms are direct...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, then, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 826.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.27979274611 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.06254065048 2.65546596893 78% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.435233160622 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.863998709 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.25 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324861035818 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165530082267 0.103423049105 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657329261263 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228983020916 0.15604864568 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347991436416 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.84 11.4140731707 69% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 14, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'give'.
Suggestion: give
The diagrams gives information about, existing source of w...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 255, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...t plant which is then drive to the sea. The water produced by the storms are direct...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, then, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 826.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.27979274611 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.06254065048 2.65546596893 78% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.435233160622 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.863998709 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.25 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324861035818 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165530082267 0.103423049105 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657329261263 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228983020916 0.15604864568 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347991436416 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.84 11.4140731707 69% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.