The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given diagram illustrates different steps implemented to make sugar from sugar canes.

Overall, it is shown in the diagram that the sugar canes which are raw materials have to experience 2 steps including growing and harvesting to get ready to be processed. Then they continue to undergo 5 more steps involving crushing, purifying juice, heating, separating, drying and cooling to become sugar.

To commence with, the first stage takes place when the sugar canes are grown in the fields in the period of at least one year to one and a half years old to make sugar. What people do in the next stage is that people use knives to pick them up on the one hand. On the other hand, they can be harvested by machines which are able to both cut and collect.

Subsequently, the sugar canes are crushed in a crusher machine which aims to produce juice. Afterwards, the juice is heated by an evaporator which has been purified by a limestone filter to become syrup. Following that, sugar crystals are separated from the syrup by a device called a centrifuge. The last step happens when the sugar crystals are dried and cooled to make the sugar that we consume.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, then, at least, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 961.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71078431373 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47227513994 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602941176471 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6021241093 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242871612747 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101672181663 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0903074251753 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172460413129 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.077098947771 0.0819641961636 94% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.