the diagram below shows a neighbourhood before and after a mall was constructed
The diagram illustrates the changes that happened in a neighbourhood after a mall was built.
Overall, the new mall occupied the space where previously there were other things.
Before the mall was constructed, there were two stores on the Main street a book store and a shoe store. Behind the stores, there was an area for woods. Next to the woods, there was a park with a lake in the middle. Across the street from the stores and park, there were houses along the main street. Behind those houses, there were more houses along the oak street.
After the mall was constructed, the area looked quite different. The mall was built where the two stores, the woods and a part of park had been before. The rest of the park turned into a parking lot and the lake was removed. Across the street from the mall, another parking lot was built in a place where houses had been before. The rest of the houses on the main street and all the houses on the oak street did not change.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 806.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50279329609 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.10750071227 2.65546596893 79% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.45251396648 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 16.9728132285 43.030603864 39% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 67.1666666667 112.824112599 60% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.9166666667 22.9334400587 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 5.23603664747 13% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.09268292683 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218774732264 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988423429206 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10550717346 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172945693383 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128259859881 0.0819641961636 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.2 13.2329268293 54% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.65 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.23 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.54 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.