The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given diagram illustrates the way that plastic bottles are recycled and reused.
Overall, it is clear that for bottles to be used again, they have to go through a 9-stage process.
Looking more closely at the given flow-chart, one can see that after being thrown into the trash cans, these plastic bottles are accumulated by automatic robot arms on trucks. Then, in the third stage, used plastic bottles are classified at the recycling center. In the next step, the sorted ones are compressed into square blocks of bottle before being crushed into pieces and washed in the fifth stage. Afterwards, these small pieces of plastic are put into machine to produce plastic pallets, which will be heated to make raw material in the eighth stage. In the final stage, these raw materials are put to use by human to create many products such as pens or plastic boxes, even clothes.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, then, third, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 732.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84768211921 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27079902731 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.655629139073 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.941506601 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.571428571 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16081048235 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909438705973 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589508951344 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140254971752 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466024183974 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.