The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The flowchart illustrates the procedure of how plastic bottles are recycled.
It is noticeable that there are nine phases in changing plastic bottles into end products like clothing, pens, or new plastic products.
As is shown in the graph, residents are supposed to throw plastic bottles into recycled trash cans. Afterwards, professional companies will collect those bottles and transport them by truck to the recycling center. The plastic bottles will be sorted by staff to check if they can be recycled. After selection, the correct bottles will be compressed into blocks and crushed by machines. Next, the crushed fragments will be collected in the water pool and washed.
In the following stage, the fragments will be put into another machine in order to turn them into plastic pellets. The seventh step is to heat those pellets until they become raw material, which is going to be gathered as the ingredients of new products. Finally, the raw material will be used to produce end products, such as clothes, recycled bags, and new plastic products.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 891.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15028901734 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60819855891 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57225433526 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.7982455465 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.1 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4 5.23603664747 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118344583496 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589240484126 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395112038763 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0869108483971 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245469353569 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.