The diagram below shows the recycling process of aluminium cans Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The diagram below shows the recycling process of aluminium cans.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given diagram illustrates the process by which aluminium cans are being recycled.
Overall, the process starts by collecting used cans which are then processed through a number of steps to obtain the recycled product which is ready to use again. In the UK almost three-fourth of the aluminium cans are recycled and thus saves a huge cost of raw material.
Alumnium cans used by people are collected from all over the places with the help of a truck and then stored in a place where they are cleaned and sorted according to different categories. After which they are shredded and compressed in a special machine before heating them to such a temperature that the aluminium comes in its molten state.
After melting, aluminium can be molded into any desired shape. The molten aluminum is rolled to form thick sheets between 2.5mm to 6mm of thickness, subsequently the final shape of the can is given to the rolled sheets. At last, the cans are ready to be used again and are sent to a soft drinks company only to be circulated in the market again.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (2 votes)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, thus

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 870.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7027027027 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49490935322 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578378378378 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9231683988 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.75 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168841615058 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806336352251 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549879472628 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119445832128 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579168850152 0.0819641961636 71% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.