The diagram shows how Liverton docks change since 1980
The map illustrates the alteration that took place at Liverton docks since 1980 until today.
Overall, it is noticeable from the diagram that Liverton has transformed significantly its function from a wet dock into a residential area.
It can be seen that a ship museum was built at the place where ships used to be while there was a construction of a new bridge to connect the two sides of the river with the appearance of a flood barrier to the coast. It is also noted that cranes, which used to operate in 1980, no longer exist now.
In the north area of the river, the warehouse located on the west has been converted into education center. In contrast, the other warehouse on the east was demolished to make way for a kid’s playing area. In addition, a crane has been erected and replaced by a sailing club.
The river walk appeared along the bank of the river while a hotel was situated in the southwest area of the river at the place where a crane used to be. In addition, the warehouse has been transformed into apartments and a parking place appeared to the southeast of the river.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 211, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...make way for a kid's playing area. In addition, a crane has been erected and ...
^^
Line 5, column 277, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...appeared to the southeast of the river.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53768844221 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58884211226 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542713567839 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4787528589 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.333333333 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109550427454 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0520622567219 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879046956524 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0877890162778 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102864383976 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.