The diagram shows proposed changes to Foster Road.
The presented map highlights to comparative study regarding future plans of the fostar road .
Overall,It can be seen that there will be so many changes available in the future. Bicycle lanes will be available on both of the sides of the street.
Now turning to the details, people will be more self- conscious towards environment. As a result, there are more trees will be sowed on the both side of the road. Traffic lights will be introduced in new plan of foster road.
Furthermore, after development of street will be compressed. Between 84 and 85, venue footpath will be available for people who want to walk. Zebra crossing is not accessible for public to cross the road.However, it will be installed on the south Side of the foster Road.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...egarding future plans of the fostar road . Overall,It can be seen that there ...
^^
Line 5, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , It
... plans of the fostar road . Overall,It can be seen that there will be so many ...
^^^
Line 13, column 205, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...accessible for public to cross the road.However, it will be installed on the south Side...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, regarding, so, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 630.0 965.302439024 65% => OK
No of words: 129.0 196.424390244 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88372093023 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.37013600491 3.73543355544 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70738634635 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.635658914729 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 186.3 283.868780488 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.749042796 43.030603864 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 70.0 112.824112599 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3333333333 22.9334400587 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119264726778 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588058177328 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632906231134 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.077283310182 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250426880186 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.2329268293 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.43 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.