The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons
where relevant.
The pie chart illustrates the comparations in 4 types of transportation consumptions: Car, LRT, Bus and taxi in Edmonton. The table summarizes the percentages of 5 major reasons for harnessing the car in this city.
In general, most of the city dwellers use cars for commuting to work purposes. While the equal least proportion of bus and taxi and the two minority reasons for transport are shopping and entertainment.
In terms of types of transportation, people in Edmonton prefer the most using cars which account for 45% of the whole, 10% higher than the second popular vehicle is light rail transit, and 4.5 times than the two least choices are bus and taxi.
In terms of purposes for car usage, commuting to work is the main reason to use cars with occupies 55% of 5 staple purposes. Besides working, business is also the second prime reason for using cars which constitutes 45 % of total usages, 5% higher than that for taking the child to school, and 3 times than that for shopping and leisure activities.
The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons
where relevant.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Where
...e main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “where” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, second, so, well, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1009.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99504950495 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85543519547 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554455445545 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.105058045 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.111111111 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319625754109 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179070350939 0.103423049105 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.206826387827 0.0843802449381 245% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243480532637 0.15604864568 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.226777848992 0.0819641961636 277% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.