The diagrams below show the design for a wave-energy machine and its location. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The two given charts describe, respectively, the basic functions of wave-energy electric generator, and the cost differences between two diverse locations.
Speaking about the functioning, the machine is based on the wave motion, that it push the water inside the first chamber; while the water level rises, it squeezes the air through the second and the third chamber, the motion of the air flow causes the movement of two turbines and,consequently, the spinning of the electric generator. The entire process is also boosed by another air flow in the opposite direction, the air enters from an opening on the top and descends down to the bottom, helping the turbines rotation and the water motion in and out the generator.
Such a design is highly efficient if it is builded offshore, because out there the waves are much higher and stronger and they can generate a great energy output. Despite the described solution is highly efficient, the drawback are the high cost of installation. To reduces the expenses it is also possible to construct the same generator near to the seaside, saving more resources, but generating less energy, considering that the waves are much weaker near the coastline.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 280, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , consequently
... causes the movement of two turbines and,consequently, the spinning of the electric generator...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 462, Rule ID: DESCEND_DOWN[1]
Message: This phrase might be redundant. Use simply 'descends'.
Suggestion: descends
...r enters from an opening on the top and descends down to the bottom, helping the turbines rot...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 503, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'turbines'' or 'turbine's'?
Suggestion: turbines'; turbine's
...escends down to the bottom, helping the turbines rotation and the water motion in and ou...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, second, so, third, while, speaking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1012.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13705583756 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7939908942 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598984771574 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.5634646637 43.030603864 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 168.666666667 112.824112599 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.8333333333 22.9334400587 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6666666667 5.23603664747 242% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0686403280687 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0334931256943 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.030696235097 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0461513907637 0.15604864568 30% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0154400680294 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.2329268293 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 61.2550243902 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.3012195122 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.06136585366 128% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.