The diagrams below show how an area called Meadowside developed from a village into a suburb of the city of Fonton.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The map illustrates the transformation of Meadowside from a pristine village to a suburb of Fonton.
Overall, Meadowside has undergone drastic changes over the period before it becomes a part of the city of Fonton. The connection of the two islands and infrastructural developments are noticeable.
In 1962, Fonton and Meadowside were two different villages which can be travelled by road or train separately. However , more than 20 years after, a road was constructed from the southeast of Fonton all the way to the southwest of Meadowside. The railway system of Fonton remained while; road widening took place to the old road of the village. In addition, the old village of Meadowside was expanded giving way to housing space and superstore at the southern tip. A leisure complex was erected at the northern part near the road.
At the present, further improvements take place. The two areas are now connected by land mass where the transport station is constructed in the middle which is the upper side of the road and behind is a hotel. On the other side, a business park is build.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 119, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...led by road or train separately. However , more than 20 years after, a road was co...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96739130435 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90485098419 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603260869565 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7244546728 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0909090909 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7272727273 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.18181818182 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151974732946 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0570342355264 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575083137143 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10941244644 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0622502155805 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.