The diagram demonstrates the issue of flooding in an area in UK and suggestion of two feasible ways to handle the situation.
When water level rises, the flood will occur around the intersection of River A and River B where an industrial park, a residential area and commercial buildings are situated on their river banks. The first solution is to relocate all the infrastructure in the town by moving them away from the flood. This can help protect the environment surroundings but seems to be very costly.
Meanwhile, preventing the flow of flood into the town is proposed as another way to solve this problem. Two dams, with their own accompany reservoir to store water, will be erected on the north and west side of river A and B respectively. While this method can save a great amount of money, its negative effects on land may pose another challenge for the local authority.
Overall, the flood can damage the infrastructure in the town and two suggested solutions have their own benefits and demerits when tackling this issue.
- The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in Towns A and B in two years 1960 and 2010 78
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status 78
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods 78
- The charts below show the results of a survey of adult education The first chart shows the reasons why adults decide to study The pie chart shows how people think the costs of adult education should be shared 84
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, may, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 860.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85875706215 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79382958269 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632768361582 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2093266267 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229527424741 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.099264045097 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837935097664 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148497696763 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501413956957 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.