The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The two diagrams provide information of a school in 2004 and its new plan for 2024. It is clear that in the second diagram, there will be more places occupied for teaching and fewer trees, as well as more students.
In the first diagram, there was only one car parking place outside the main entrance, linking a path which connected the two school buildings and a sports field. Besides, the rest area in the south and east is covered with lots of trees.
Turning to the new plan, a new school building is planned adjacent to the original two and the old path will be within this area, which makes it more independent. Furthermore, cars are allowed to enter the campus along a new road, which will be built almost across the whole school, and the road extends to an extra new parking next to the new school building in the northeast of the campus. Meanwhile, the sports field will be relocated to the south of the new parking.
As a result of the plan, the numbers of trees will be reduced and the number of students are expected to rise from 600 in 2004 to 1,000 in 2024.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 419, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the campus. Meanwhile, the sports field will be relocated to the south of the ne...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, second, so, well, while, as a result, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 876.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.40201005025 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25339767144 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542713567839 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4463092657 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.875 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.625 5.23603664747 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178483066481 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0905907104775 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0952308766559 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116217531366 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590817081615 0.0819641961636 72% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.54 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.