The diagrams below show the water supply system in Australia present and in future.
The two diagrams compare how water is supplied by the system in Australia nowadays and in later life.
Overall, while the number of parts of the water supply system has stayed constant, such as a dam, water treatment plant, and consumers, its route has changed. In addition, these days, a river takes part in this system, however, it will not in the future.
As can be seen from the first diagram, firstly, water which is stored in a dam or storage is divided into two kinds, waste water flows to the water treatment plants, and pure water is transported to residential, industrial, and commercial places. Then, after being used in the aforementioned places, the waste is transferred back to the water treatment plants and the storm water is dumped into the nearby river.
Regarding the second diagram, pure water will move from not only the dam or the storage but also the water treatment plants to people for using. Afterwards, storm and waste water after consuming will be pumped to the water treatment plants, rather than going straight into the river like it is in present. Next, they will be cycled to reuse in the city.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-23 | khanh_uyen | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-03 | TranMinhDuc | 82 | view |
| 2021-01-22 | suedas | 61 | view |
| 2021-01-07 | xuanhieu26 | 67 | view |
| 2020-11-30 | Jango Jo | 82 | view |
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years 84
- Some people feel that certain workers like nurses doctors and teachers should be paid more while many people think that other people like film actors or singers should be paid huge sums of money due to the importance of the work that they do and their rol 78
- Some people think that physical strength is important for success in sport while other people think that mental strength is more important Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after 5 years 73
- The graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in five countries 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, regarding, second, so, then, while, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 936.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77551020408 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43088553785 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55612244898 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6709080221 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 5.23603664747 229% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274182113547 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13243504706 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.094817949273 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200604113043 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0803545062731 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.