Eating sweet foods produces acid in the mouth, which can cause tooth decay. (High acid levels are measured by low pH values)
Describe the information below and discuss the implications for dental health.
The line chart indicate about the acidity changing when human being eat three kinds of sugar (fruit sugar, cane sugar and honey) in humans’ month. And whether they can cause tooth decay or not with time.
The line all start from the 7 PH level after human ate them. But the cane sugar can cause a more serious increase in acidity than other two sugar, which the PH level drop lower than 4 while the other two are higher than that within 5 minutes. The line of honey drop less serious than other two, and it shows a level-off in the after five minutes, while the PH level line of cane sugar and fruit sugar start to raise. The PH level of fruit sugar has become higher than the figure of honey when the time reach in 10 minutes, however after that time the line of honey raise and goes over the fruit sugar.
It costs the longest time for cane sugar to reach the acid level at which tooth decay may not occurs, and the honey cost the least time of it. Also, it cost the longest time for human body come back to 7 PH after consume the cane sugar, and the figure for honey cost the least.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, may, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 892.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.24761904762 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 1.66258684325 2.65546596893 63% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461904761905 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5300891541 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.25 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152669584346 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0903616677428 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471068286587 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119117719001 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.012244527779 0.0819641961636 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.67 11.4140731707 67% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.58 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.