New household appliances have resulted in more free time for women and has enabled them to both work and run a home
with dependent children.
What are the advantages for a family when the mother works?
Do you think the disadvantages outweigh the advantages?
Women dreams of escaping from loads of housework and baby caring and with the technology development, their dream seems can come true. The household appliances make life more convenient to every mother and also allows them to both work and care teenagers. However, this brings both merits and demerits to children and mothers and this essay will discuss both.
Obviously, a family with two working parents has less financial pressure and higher life quality. The money that earned by mother can also be used in other aspect toward child such as afterschool classes or other interests. Moreover, women can achieve their own meaning by work rather than being bound by family if they cost less time in home. Finally, the more women can work, the more benefits society can get, since in some positions such as activities planning and nursing, women can do better job than men generally.
However, the increase of working mothers can also cause some problems. The most important thing is the kids’ security problem. If those little children met emergencies, their parents cannot back to home immediately, which sometime even led to lethal condition. Also, without the company of parents, children may feel lonely and in a long-term, they become unconcerned toward family and in replacement, addicted to computer games or smart phone. Finally, companies may treating working mothers differently, since these employers believe working mothers are burdened by both family and the work, so they cannot finish job perfectly.
Overall, I tend to believe the increasing number of working mothers can bring more benefits than its disadvantages. The government can help those mothers to care their kids and the problem can be solved.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, may, moreover, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1465.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26978417266 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55691388241 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607913669065 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6164857476 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.642857143 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230537841359 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834681168179 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588858914866 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143072038553 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395022655502 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.