Eating sweet foods produces acid in the mouth, which can cause tooth decay. (High acid levels are measured by low pH values)
The line graph depicts how 3 different types of sugar resources influence PH level in mouth which refers to acidity on the basis of within 40 minutes. The acidity that determines tooth decay is PH 5.5 provided.
As seen above, the overall trends are the same that it commences with PH7 in mouth. First and foremost, cane sugar shows the biggest movements in graph. It decreases by approximately PH3.5 to PH2 in 5 minutes which is generally thought the lowest PH in human body and detrimental to tooth. However, fruit sugar illustrates a wilder line. It drops by about PH2.8 which is slightly higher than PH 4 while honey which is known as the simplest mono-saccharide structure describes the minimum fall at about PH 4.7.
Turning out attention to the time after 5 minutes, cane sugar steadily increases to PH 7 for the given time which is 40 minutes and fruit sugar reaches PH 7 within 35 minutes. However, honey recovers its PH back to 7 in 25 minutes from the moment of eating occurs. It is estimated that honey makes the oral environment detrimental to tooth for less than 10 minutes, fruit sugar stays about 15 minutes and cane sugar exposes to the condition which tooth decay occurs approximately 30 minutes.
To sum up, cane sugar is deemed to be the most detrimental sugar resource with respect to oral health among the given sugar resources.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, while, to sum up, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1124.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76271186441 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62033021245 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563559322034 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 88.1174784024 43.030603864 205% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 112.4 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187376672152 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0894046243736 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0924306276845 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131065541368 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108659084885 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.