The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph illustrates how much of carbon dioxide had been averagely emitted for four decades from 1967 in 4 different countries, namely United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal.
To commence with the country which depicts the highest among them, United Kingdom recorded the first ranking at about 11 tonnes of carbon dioxide emission and gradually decreased by 2 tonnes over the given period but still ranked first. Sweden which ranked second on account of about 9 tonnes in 1976 raised slightly over 10 tonnes for a decade but dropped by 3 tonnes for the next 10 years and showed a steady decrease over the rest period.
Now turning our attention to Italy and Portugal, the overall trend for both countries are the same. Italy started with the figure slightly over 4 tonnes. Even though Italy pointed out a considerable increase for the first decade and scored a gradual rise between in 1977 and 1997, it stayed the same for the latest 10 years. Portugal held the lowest ranking between them at about 1 ton and had shown a steady growth over the whole period taking over Italy.
All in all, United Kingdom and Sweden described a trend that their emissions went down. On the other hand, Italy and
Portugal demonstrated an upward trend so that we can check out the gaps between four countries had finally decreased.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nited Kingdom recorded the first ranking at about 11 tonnes of carbon dioxide emi...
^^
Line 7, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... went down. On the other hand, Italy and Portugal demonstrated an upward trend so...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, second, so, still, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1101.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85022026432 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28753586936 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612334801762 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6516945933 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.333333333 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2222222222 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169405355202 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750983590044 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579471767297 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108583377719 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620980403014 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.