Eating too much sugar is harmful for health. Some people think that it is government responsibility to limit people’s sugar consumption, while others think that it is individual responsibility to limit the amount of sugar they eat. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Eating sugar in high quantity can be dangerous for human body. While some people hold the opinion that it is the responsibility of government to implement sanctions as well as provide in limitation according to the need of family. Whereas, rest of the people believes that it must be reduced by every individuals. My inclination supports the statement that every single person is responsible to look this sort of matters at their end instead of blaming on government.
To commence with, in order to streamline the situation of decreasing sugar quantity people need to put their some efforts for the betterment of health problem that eventually will be worthwhile for everyone alongside future generation. Moreover, survey adepts that in some countries people are much habitual of taking high sugar that create many diseases for instance, diabetic problem, increasing cholesterol level, kidney damage and many others. Many intellectual people are concerned that parents plays most imperative role among the children's life while they are growing up, they can easily make their habits accordingly either it is sugar or something else.
On the flip side, one possible solution of reducing sugar quantity is to be provided efficient counseling to the nation through the government on quarterly basis that actually is most significant in order to curb the tendency of society. Apart from this, government can set the sugar quantity as well according to census which will be helpful to some extent. Along with this, government need to widely spread it's adverse consequences around the country so that people can understand it's pitfalls in a easy way.
To sum up, it is quite difficult to impose above mentioned responsibility on government shoulder whereas, government may put their some efforts to stop increasing sugar usage but, it is the responsibility of every person avoid excessive use of sugar.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 232, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...tation according to the need of family. Whereas, rest of the people believes that it mu...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 497, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a easy way" with adverb for "easy"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...that people can understand its pitfalls in a easy way. To sum up, it is quite difficult to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 500, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...t people can understand its pitfalls in a easy way. To sum up, it is quite dif...
^
Line 7, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ry person avoid excessive use of sugar.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, but, if, look, may, moreover, so, well, whereas, while, apart from, for instance, sort of, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 1.00243902439 1097% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 5.60731707317 464% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 3.97073170732 428% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 965.302439024 166% => OK
No of words: 304.0 196.424390244 155% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27302631579 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83385246419 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 106.607317073 164% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575657894737 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 283.868780488 179% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.2631500473 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.727272727 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6363636364 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2727272727 5.23603664747 234% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311215049928 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115872743749 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574282603076 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189149659418 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451987713615 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.2329268293 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 61.2550243902 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 40.7170731707 219% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.