electricity production by fuel source in France
The given pie charts illustrate the comparison of electricity production by different fuels sources in france in the years 1990 and 2010.
Overall, electricity production did not stay similar over the period stemming from the 5 diverse sources. In the second period nuclear power became the major sector in manufacturing. While coal, oil, natural gas and hydro power also contributed to production, the percentage of their majority significantly decreased in the year 2010.
comparatively, the largest segments of manufacture of electricity in france declined in their percentage. More specifically, 28% of coal source was only 13% in 2010, decreasing at 15%; meanwhile the second previous most contributed to a production segment of natural gas fell in percentage from 28 to 4, which is an approximately sevenfold decline.
In contrast, nuclear power made up a biggest part of the chart in 2010, increasing significant from 17 to 67%, which is a rise of 50%. comparing to 22% of oil source in 1990, which has not risen,seeing the same trajectory that have other sectors, exclude nuclear power, falling to 13%. At the same time, hydro power was the smallest segment, almost remained similar over the period, falling slightly from 6 to 2%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 336, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gnificantly decreased in the year 2010. comparatively, the largest segments of m...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Comparatively
...ntly decreased in the year 2010. comparatively, the largest segments of manufacture of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 350, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is an approximately sevenfold decline. In contrast, nuclear power made up a big...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 36, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
... In contrast, nuclear power made up a biggest part of the chart in 2010, incr...
^
Line 13, column 136, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Comparing
...from 17 to 67%, which is a rise of 50%. comparing to 22% of oil source in 1990, which has...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 195, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , seeing
... oil source in 1990, which has not risen,seeing the same trajectory that have other sec...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1057.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.285 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03110540892 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7975138818 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.444444444 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237169500319 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105240136465 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143914764446 0.0843802449381 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189379800707 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.170315797658 0.0819641961636 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.