The energy consumption by Fuel from 1980-2030
The chart compares the usage of four kinds of energy in the U.S from 1980 to 2030. It was measured by quadrillion.
Overall, fossil fuels are preferable by American people while green resources are still less popular.
In 1980, the consumption P&O topped the list at 35, being followed by NG (20) and C(15) respectively. In the next 35 years, three of them experienced fluctuating increases, with the amount of consumed P&O reaching roughly 42 and that of NG and C tying for the second rank of 25. Until 2030, the usage of P&O and C are predicted to share the same upward pattern while the tendency of NG is forecasted to stay unchanged. (P&O will secure the first rank at 50).
When it comes to alternative resource, as it can be seen in the graph, at the very first time, they both started with the lowest point (roughly 5). While the usage of N continuously grew, leaving behind its counterpart of S/W and H, which shared similar hover around 5 unti 2015. In the next 15 years, the consumption of these green sources is predicted to be unchanged, with the amount of consumed H being at the bottom of the list at 4.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 63, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
... usage of four kinds of energy in the U.S from 1980 to 2030. It was measured by ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 915.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48529411765 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57428560319 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607843137255 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.658439751 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181007372499 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685918781794 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112338530692 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12484980188 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114229608069 0.0819641961636 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.