The figures below compare the number of internet users in several European nations as well the prevalence of online shopping in these countries.
A glance at the diagrams provided reveal the index of internet users in 5 european countries and online shopping balance of 3 different states in 2004. The first categories data is given in millions for a span of 9 years with a close look at 1995, 2000 and 2004.
Remarkably, the number of internet users in switzerland ascended exponentially from 1995 to 2004 (accordingly, 1 and 4). Similarly, there was a zenith for the indication of germany from 5 in 1995 to 314 in 2000. Moreover, the letter data was the most predominant whole the period in the group. this was followed by a downtrend till 15 in the ultimate year. A three-fold uptake from initial 2 was the case in the france. Comparably, the indication for Spain quadrupled with the final 2 from 1995. Furthermore, its first number was the lowest in the group throughout the period. there was experienced an increase by 25 from initial 25 at the start.
In terms of internet shopping, the quantity for switzerland was a bit higher than germany. Notably, this category in france was the most striking in the group and its number was almost equal with the total figure of switzerland and germany.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 163, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'categories'' or 'category's'?
Suggestion: categories'; category's
...f 3 different states in 2004. The first categories data is given in millions for a span of...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 293, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...dominant whole the period in the group. this was followed by a downtrend till 15 in ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 576, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...est in the group throughout the period. there was experienced an increase by 25 from ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e was the most striking in the group and its number was almost equal with the tot...
^^
Line 5, column 243, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...otal figure of switzerland and germany.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, furthermore, if, look, moreover, similarly
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 959.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74752475248 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79085448176 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544554455446 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.7764821443 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.9166666667 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8333333333 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102019798396 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0397400461357 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060804036148 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0797258628915 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333987720188 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.