International tourism is now more common than ever before. Some feel that this is a positive trend, while others do not.
The past 50 years have seen a considerable increase in global tourism. Despite the undeniable economic prosperity it has brought to many host countries, I would argue that the overall impact of international holiday making has in fact been negative. Two of the primary drawbacks associated with this trend are as follows.
First of all, global tourism tends to export many negative aspects of western culture. Since it is only the wealthy who can afford to travel abroad, developing countries like Thailand and Indonesia have become the playgrounds of tourists from more affluent ones. In many such nations, this influx of mainly western tourists has brought with it problems such as prostitution as well as alcoholism and drug abuse. Admittedly, international tourism does have the potential to foster greater understanding and tolerance between people of different cultures. However, this is unlikely to occur while it remains such a potent symbol of western cultural domination and moral decadence.
Even more disturbing, through, is the environmental degradation that international tourism has caused in many parts of the world. one particularly salient example of this is Great Barrier reef in Australia – the countless boats, drivers and snorkelers that have visited the reef over the past few decades have gradually destroyed vast sections of coral. Similarly, world renowned Kuta Beach in Bali has become heavily polluted in recent years. In order to be sustainable greater regulation of global tourism is required.
In conclusion, the challenges presented by the booming international tourist industry are numerous and complex. Although they are by no means insurmountable, it is highly unlikely that they will be resolved in the foreseeable future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-04 | vivukhue | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-13 | radikalyuda | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-13 | radikalyuda | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-13 | radikalyuda | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-13 | radikalyuda | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows the numbers of male and female research students studying six science-related subjects at a UK university in 2009.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 11
- Men and women are different in terms of their characteristics and abilities. For this reason, some jobs are better done by men and others by women. 67
- Men and women are different in terms of their characteristics and abilities. For this reason, some jobs are better done by men and others by women. 67
- -Many people choose to work or live abroad because of the higher standards of living they can find outside their home country. Do you think this brings more advantages or disadvantages to the people who follow this path? 73
- The international community must act immediately to ensure all nations to reduce their consumption of fossil fuels e.g. gas and oil. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 131, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
... has caused in many parts of the world. one particularly salient example of this is...
^^^
Line 6, column 189, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Barrier) must be used with a third-person verb: 'reefs'.
Suggestion: reefs
...alient example of this is Great Barrier reef in Australia – the countless boats, dri...
^^^^
Line 8, column 235, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... be resolved in the foreseeable future.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, similarly, so, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50549450549 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96453564689 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6336996337 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3036829906 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.357142857 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136811318651 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0452339200951 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0323596861709 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0739875822238 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282515308588 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.42 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.