The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period.
The two presented line graph enumerates the average monthly that British’s parent pays for their children’s sporting activities and the number of children in British who took part in three different types of sports Football, Athletics and Swimming in the years 2008 and 2014.
Overall, it is clearly seen that there was a significant rise in the amount of money annually paying for the offspring’s physical work out during the six years period. In addition, in term of children behavior, Football, Athletics and Swimming were all experienced an upward trend.
To be more specific, in 2008, average monthly money was paid for British’s kids almost 20 pounds by their parents and kept a gradual increase over the next following six years, finally, it reached the apex at over 30 pounds in 2014.
Otherwise, the second graph illustrates a fluctuated trend, in 2008 approximately 8 million participants attractive in Football, whereas, Athletics and Swimming players less than 1 and nearly 2 million respectively. The figure of the football joiners remained relatively stable between 2008 to 2014. By contrast, participation in Swimming roughly doubled, around 4 million children in 2014 compared to 2008, but, there was a dramatic change show the index more than fivefold increase in the number of children enrolled in Athletics.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d Swimming in the years 2008 and 2014. Overall, it is clearly seen that there w...
^^
Line 2, column 289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g were all experienced an upward trend. To be more specific, in 2008, average mo...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed the apex at over 30 pounds in 2014. Otherwise, the second graph illustrates ...
^^
Line 4, column 535, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mber of children enrolled in Athletics.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, second, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1140.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37735849057 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04954927834 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617924528302 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.8879660328 43.030603864 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.857142857 112.824112599 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2857142857 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311940846825 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127539473469 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0928091047117 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178931127558 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0931811074983 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.2329268293 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.52 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.