The first graph below shows the weight (in tonnes) of fruit produced by a farm during each month in 2013, and also the amount (in tonnes) of fertiliser used. The second graph shows the volume of rainfall in each month (in millimetres.)
The charts below depict the tonnage of fruit generated in a farm in the year 2013, the fertilizer applied and the amount of precipitation in that year.
To begin with, fruit production increased steadily from just over 2 tons in January to reach a peak in August, at roughly 4.2 tons. Throughout colder months of the year, the rate declined in a fluctuating trend by approximately 1 ton per month. With only 2.1 tons in December. Regarding fertilizer usage, this seasonal pattern is largely reversed, there was a moderate rise from January to April, by 500 kilograms, followed by a sharp decrease throughout the summer, with 0-5 kilograms used. Fertilizer consumption increased slightly in the autumn, rising to a total of around 7 tons before dipping to just below 0.5 tons in December.
In addition to this, a clear correlation can be seen between rainfall and the amount of fertilizer applied, with an increase up to 16 millimeters in February, falling dramatically to 4 millimeters in July, August and September. Rainfall then increased significantly, comprising 14 millimeters in December.
To summary, the farm used the most fertilizer at seasons of high precipitation level, whereas it produced the most fruit when both figures were around lowest,
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, then, whereas, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1061.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1756097561 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01349729926 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629268292683 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9049881644 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.888888889 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10611334643 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0444349649737 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378571806165 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0686924412809 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298213087495 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.