The following is a diagram of a mobile phone recycling process.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The flow diagram illustrates the sequential steps taken in the recycling of mobile phones.
Overall, it seems to be a complex process, involving many steps. However, in the end, most of the material is utilized in one way or the other, with minimal wastage, making it an efficient process.
At first, the mobile phones, after being received from consumers, sent to storage and forwarding facility. From there, it is segregated into three groups, namely components to be sold again, handset, and battery. The former group is directly put into the sale, whereas the latter two goes into complex recycling process separately, yet the similar steps are followed for each one of them, including dismantling, mechanical and magnetic separation. After separation, the product obtained from both groups collectively segregated into three types: metal parts and wiring board, plastics, and other materials.
Furthermore, the first type undergoes complex processed of copper smelting and valuable metal refining before being reused, whereas the plastics are either reprocessed in order to make lower grade plastics or incinerated to obtain energy. No further processing is done for other materials.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1017.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55737704918 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73779762722 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.688524590164 0.547539520022 126% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.9614081177 43.030603864 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123803693548 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526401587252 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411312583922 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0871093913467 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351418473712 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.06136585366 128% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 40.7170731707 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.