Some people believe that the internet will replace traditional books in the future. Do you believe this would be a positive or negative development?
There is no doubt that internet has revolutionarized our lives. It is believed by a few individuals that, internet will be a feasible replacement of classical books in times to come. In my opinion, this is a positive change and all of us should welcome it.
To begin with, traditional texts and litratures are very informative for us. They enable us to know about our culture, traditions and successful practices to lead a pleasant life. For example, the ancient sacred text of hindu mythology, the vedas, are the rule books for leading life with hindu believes. However, since these sacred texts were written centuries ago, there is a great and mammoth responsibility on the shoulders of competent authorities to protect and archive them in their physical format. This process claims for a considerable amount of manpower and financial resources. Besides that, even if these books are thoroughly protected, reading them in their original format, will not be easy for the masses, as the more these texts will be accessed by readers the more decay it can cause to such valuable litratures.
Nevertheless, with advent of internet in day to day life, now it is more convenient to protect, archive and access such manuscripts online. For instance, many countries have already created their national digital archives, where thousands of books from a number of sources have already been converted in digital format and made available for common people to read. Although, there is a minor caution over digitalization of readable material, that is the potential of manipulation that might be done while making digital copies of such texts. This has to be strictly regulated, in order to increase the acceptance of digital libraries.
In conclusion, I believe that electronic libraries will significantly influence the world of literature in a positive way, yet there is a need of strict quality and content control, in order to avoid dispersion of manipulated and inappropriate content to the public.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-27 | utkarshshahi | 84 | view |
- Some people think healthcare should be made free for all people, while others believe people should pay for healthcare by themselves. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- The bar chart below shows the average monthly maximum temperatures for three Australian cities in the year 2016. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The bar chart below shows the average monthly maximum temperatures for three Australian cities in the year 2016. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The following is a diagram of mobile phone recycling process Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 77
- Some people think healthcare should be made free for all people, while others believe people should pay for healthcare by themselves. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 105, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...antly influence the world of literature in a positive way, yet there is a need of strict quality ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, nevertheless, so, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1680.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18518518519 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96037052225 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601851851852 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.6275825537 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19967206612 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657118685518 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668861459881 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130213814127 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0768359987953 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.