The following maps show the changes that have taken placed in the centre of a town since 1700 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant

The two maps depict the layout of the centre of a town from its establishment in 1700 to present day.
Overall, the town looks modernized now compared to the past after many modifications have been taken place.
To initiate with the development of town centre, the market square, which is right in the centre of the town, has not changed over three centuries. Another feature that has remained the same is the church located in the centre, next to market square. The hotel has been expanded which can be observed in the left side of the market square at present times. Replacement of goode farm in the northern side, by car park and accommodation area can be experienced in these days. Accommodation facilities has been introduced by building rows of house and block of flats has been erected by eliminating stables in the eastern part of the town centre.
House occupied the south east corner that is covered by supermarket. More shops and houses are built in the south side. North west corner of town centre remained same and steggle farm, which can be seen in the south west side of the 1700s map is no longer there. The roads have been modernized and traffic lights, a roundabout and zebra crossing have been added in recent times.

Votes
Average: 7 (6 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...ishment in 1700 to present day. Overall,the town looks modernized now compared to t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...present times. Replacement of goode farm in the northern side, by car park and ac...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 982.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6985645933 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50379625233 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55980861244 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.6391464591 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2727272727 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.727272727273 5.23603664747 14% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123712414133 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0456336932498 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484531932758 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0826060181139 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390516559285 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.