The following two pie charts show the results of the survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among adults in 1985 and 1995
The two charts compared the popularity of various relaxation of European adults from 1985 to 1995. In general, watching TV had a downward trend, whereas the other figures saw significant growth in the period of the question. Furthermore, there was an increase in playing computer games over 1995.
During the period from 1985 to 1995, the percentage of exciting in talking with friends are only a third, 18% and 7% respectively. This was the same with eating out and other activities. Twice as European adults were attractive in eating out and other activities over a period of 10 years.
It can be seen from the charts that in 1985, the most supported activities like watching TV before decreasing slightly in 1995, 32% and 30% respectively. On the other hand, talking with friends was less popular in 1985, with 21%, but it grew up moderately in 1995, with 26%. Moreover, the appears of new activity, playing computers, saw an increase considerably in 1995, with 27%.
In conclusion, both watching TV and playing computer games were more attractive than other activities between 1985 and 1995.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, third, whereas, in conclusion, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 922.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03825136612 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73498223087 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551912568306 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.4228007322 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2 5.23603664747 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202598413166 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0914138185466 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0994185343503 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133265814139 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464580036547 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.