The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The line graph given illustrates the information about the amount of average carbon dioxide released each person in 4 European countries, namely the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal over the course of 40 years from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, the number of UK and Italy had an upward trend in the levels of CO2, whereas there was a considerable increase in the others.
In 1967, the United Kingdom ranked the highest points in CO2 air pollutants each person, about 11 metric tonnes while just only 1 metric tonnes were emitted CO2 by each the Portuguese. At this point, the people lived in Sweden had the CO2 at 9 metric tonnes, which was twice times as the average levels of this emission, just over 4 metric tonnes.
For 40 years, the figure for the UK saw a significant decline in the amount of CO2 by 2 metric tonnes, from 1967 to 2007. Besides, in 2007, the amount of this air pollutant in Sweden drops steadily at 5 metric tonnes after growing rapidly in 1977, just over 9 metric tonnes. By contrast, there was the same pattern as CO2 in Italy and Portugal. These countries remained stable in the period from 1997 to 2007 after going sharply, about 7 and around 5 respectively.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 985.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64622641509 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4076527081 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551886792453 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9199784207 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.125 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266639154395 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11599606391 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101684079139 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174521234916 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117292902402 0.0819641961636 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.