The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995.
Both of two pie charts collate that European adults were busy with several activities over a period of decennial.
It is clear that leisure activities of European adults include several activities, and their percentages changed certain degree during 10 years.
Pie charts show that senior people talked with their family in 18 rates in 1985, whereas, after decade years, this activity dropped dramatically to 7 percent. The proportion of adults, who talked with their friends, increased slightly from 4 to 26 percent between 1985 and 1995.
In 1985, people ate 3 percent of food out, which in 1995, this proportion declined suddenly to 8 percent. Over a period of 10 years, senior people spent their most of time to watch TV, because, within 10 years, proportion of watching TV did not decrease from approximately 30 percent to down. Nevertheless, in backmost year, playing computer games joint above leisure activities, and it was 27 rates.
It is interesting to note that adults spent their most of time to talk with their friends, watching TV and playing computer games. Although, playing online games were not in aforegoing years, in 1995, it became to the most work -out of leisure activities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Both of two pie charts collate that Euro...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ivities over a period of decennial. It is clear that leisure activities of E...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ged certain degree during 10 years. Pie charts show that senior people talke...
^^^^
Line 5, column 220, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f adults, who talked with their friends, increased slightly from 4 to 26 percent ...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...4 to 26 percent between 1985 and 1995. In 1985, people ate 3 percent of foo...
^^^
Line 7, column 249, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...years, proportion of watching TV did not decrease from approximately 30 percent ...
^^
Line 7, column 278, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... TV did not decrease from approximately 30 percent to down. Nevertheless, in bac...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re activities, and it was 27 rates. It is interesting to note that adults s...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 31, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ates. It is interesting to note that adults spent their most of time to ...
^^
Line 9, column 147, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...TV and playing computer games. Although, playing online games were not in aforego...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
nevertheless, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 5.60731707317 285% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1013.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11616161616 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63691023398 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570707070707 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.5255862921 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 112.555555556 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188038356917 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886399095706 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693828825467 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126415826655 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665694170826 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.