Below given map illustrates the two potential sites for a novel supermarket intended for the town of Garlsdon, with a populace of 65,000; wherein the locations under consideration are on the northwest and south of Garlsdon.
It can be seen that the proposed site S1, on the outskirts of Garlsdon, has a rail route relatively close by, intersecting the town, while, a main road connects the town to Hindon, 12 Kms afar, whose population is 10,000. Meanwhile, on the eastern side of S1 is a residential area whilst another housing area is located towards the south of S2.
With regard to S2, located within the town centre, a no parking zone, has a railway route fairly close to it, and, two main roads connecting the town to Brandson, with 15,000 residents, 16 Kms away and Cransdon, lying 25 Kms away with a census of 29,000 respectively,hence making the supermarket easily accessible to their inhabitants.
In conclusion both S1 and S2 have excellent accessibility to public transport. With respect to distance, S2 is easily accessible to majority of the population, but, being located in a no traffic zone makes it less convenient for car users. By contrast, S1, can provide exceptional parking space but, it would be difficult to reach for the residents of town and nearby areas; unless, they opt-in to avail the benefits of the public transport.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, while, in conclusion, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87027027027 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89098748171 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632432432432 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 22.4926829268 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.0556684694 43.030603864 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 180.2 112.824112599 160% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.0 22.9334400587 161% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251944060445 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138180135955 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130606259544 0.0843802449381 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151909129319 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108953243378 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 13.2329268293 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 61.2550243902 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.56 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.9970731707 153% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.