the given graph show the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010
The vertical graph depict the spending of France and UK on cars, computers, books, perfume and camera in 2010. The data is calibrated in pounds.
The most striking feature to be observed is that the largest 450,000 pounds sterling whereas computers, books occupied second and third position with 400,000, 300,00 pounds respectively. Money spent on perfume and camers were equally reported.
Turning to rest of description, in UK, spending on cars had highest 400,000 pounds followed by books and cameras and computers with 390,000, 350,000, 300,000 pounds orderly. Perfume stood at lowest position. As far as comparison is concerned, spending money on cameras in UK was twice compare to France. Further, in France, large amount spent on cars and computers while in UK biggest expenditure on books and cars.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
.... The data is calibrated in pounds. The most striking feature to be observed is...
^^^
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nding on cars had highest 400,000 pounds followed by books and cameras and compu...
^^
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...00 pounds followed by books and cameras and computers with 390,000, 350,000, 300...
^^
Line 5, column 288, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'compared'.
Suggestion: compared
...ending money on cameras in UK was twice compare to France. Further, in France, large a...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 315, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...UK was twice compare to France. Further, in France, large amount spent on cars an...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, so, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 684.0 965.302439024 71% => OK
No of words: 129.0 196.424390244 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3023255814 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.37013600491 3.73543355544 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61710294234 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.651162790698 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 186.3 283.868780488 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.0045452667 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.5 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.125 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0396108928948 0.215688989381 18% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0196086078204 0.103423049105 19% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036998312196 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0381452879278 0.15604864568 24% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041319452566 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.