The given graph shows the past and the projected figures of the government spending as a percentage of GDP for the years 2000 to 2025 in three areas.
The line graph illustrates the past and predicted spending of GDP by the government from 2000 to 2025 in the three regions.
Overall, it is apparent that, in health sector, the percentage of the expenditure of GDP will follow an upward trend, on the other hand, in education, and roads and railways sectors, the percentage of spending will experience a downward trend.
The proportion of the expenditure in the health was increased over the next few years, an it will continue to increase in future. The percentage stood at 4% in 2000, which rose gradually, and it is expected to reach 7.5% by 2025.
On the other hand, the expenditure in the education and the transportation sectors will decline over the period given. In 2000, in the education sector, the spendings was higher than the other two sectors, but it went down steadily over next fee years. It is predicted that it will decline in near future, and will stand at just below 4% in 2025. Similar pattern also will be seen in transportation sectors. From 2000 to 2025, the percentage slightly fluctuated until 2015. It started from 4% in 2000, and it is estimated that, in 2025, it will remain around 3.5%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'an' or 'it'?
Suggestion: an; it
... was increased over the next few years, an it will continue to increase in future. Th...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 120, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... years, an it will continue to increase in future. The percentage stood at 4% in 2000, wh...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 972.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7881773399 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68924012027 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507389162562 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8529425931 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209608930761 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0974835768435 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110715059505 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168924065333 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126757630518 0.0819641961636 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.