The given line graph compares the average number of hours taken to produce a car by four selected companies in US from 1998 to 2005.
Overall, the average time spent on making a car dropped substantially. In details, that of General Motor witnessed the most significant changes in comparison with the other three manufactures.
In 1998, General Motor spent 32 hours producing a vehicle while it was 28 hours in terms of Ford. In contrast, both Toyota and Honda took only 22 hours to manufacturing a product. During the span of time, the average time of the two latter experienced a mild fluctuation around 22%. Meanwhile, Ford, after a sight increase to reach a peak at roughly 32 hours in 2001, there was a moderate reduction in the number of hours spending on a car.
Moving on to the figure for General Motor, it was a rapid decline of 10 hours within the 8-year period. However, this company still overtook the others to spend the most hours on making a car in 2005. Coming after was Ford with 21 hours and Toyota and Honda with 20 hours. Although four companies stayed exactly the same order as in 1998, the gap between them was immensely reduced after 8 years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...while it was 28 hours in terms of Ford. In contrast, both Toyota and Honda took on...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, still, while, as for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68852459016 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56550248101 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612021857923 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.1294647774 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.8 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199545700907 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076857734021 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525441897939 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124333987662 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046987394962 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.