the given maps show the access point to city hospital in 2007 and 2010.summaries the information by reporting main features and make comparison where possible.
The given maps provide information enterence road to city hospital in 2007 and 2010. In 2010 new development about transportation and parking were made.
the first picture gives information about 2007 city hospital entry through ring road which circulates around the medical center. Another way is hospital road which intersect the city road at middle. However, bus stop had present on both eastern and western side of hospital road. Besides bus stop car parking for staff and people were present.
Although, in 2010 new improvements were made in traffic system to hospital but main circular road around medical center and hospital road were there as it is. In second map public parking shifted to east of circular road while earlier parking lot were reserved only for staff vehicles. On the other side of hospital road bus station were constructed and joined via roundabout one side to ring road and other side with city road.
To summaries, to reduce traffic congestion to city hospital traffic system were being changed in 2010. The main difference is separate reservation of place for public, staff parking and bus stop.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... transportation and parking were made. the first picture gives information about 2...
^^^
Line 3, column 35, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent. Although, in 2010 new improvements were made in traffic system to hospital ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 943.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0972972973 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45964359275 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540540540541 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3845779888 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.7272727273 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8181818182 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27272727273 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169387714307 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0880370585373 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0948346887268 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142861217028 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759703744713 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.