It is argued that many governments in various countries should investigate to construct the train transportation more than roads. I totally agree with this opinion and think traveling by train might bring more advantages than private car.
First of all, transportation by train might spend less time more than using cars. Recently, many countries usually struggle with the traffic congestion especially in the big cities. For example, in Bangkok, some people who use the private car always faced with the terrible situation on the main road in rush hour. However, some people travel by train because they avoid the traffic congestion and waste time less than using car. That’s why it is more important to spend money for construction railways because it might help to reduce the traffic congestion.
Secondly, using train might help to reduce emitting carbondioxide. Currently, many companies use technology to produce eco-train which use green energy such as steam of water instead of burning fuel. However, various companies create some features for cars which use electricity for reducing usage of fuel but the cost is very expensive and the charger stations are less than gas stations. For instance, Many research said that burning of fuel from car lead to the terrible problem, global warming. Thus, advantages of transportation by train might help to reduce emitting carbondioxide which lead to the global warming.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that investigation of railways is more beneficial than roads because it help people to spend less time in rush hour and reducing emitted carbondioxide
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 405, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun research seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much research', 'a good deal of research'.
Suggestion: Much research; A good deal of research
...e less than gas stations. For instance, Many research said that burning of fuel from car lead...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 107, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'helps'?
Suggestion: helps
...s more beneficial than roads because it help people to spend less time in rush hour ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1368.0 965.302439024 142% => OK
No of words: 255.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36470588235 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80232780702 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525490196078 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 283.868780488 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3954254033 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.230769231 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6153846154 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61538461538 5.23603664747 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127669432706 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536394994417 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534302362814 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10198702186 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688191303134 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.