Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is a controversial issue that the government should finance train tracks instead of spending its budget on roads. I would actively see eye to eye with this statement as spending on railways able to fully utilize the citizens' taxes.
First of all, the advent of technology has brought tremendous benefits to human life in this day and age. The government should spend money on using advanced technology on the train. For example, using the latest technology on the railway is convenient for the citizens as it reduces the travel time to traverse around the city as well as cost-effective. Furthermore, a high-speed train can reduce traffic congestion, improve mobility and reliability of travel on the roads. For instance, ambulances and firefighters can increase their throughput across their service during an emergency.
Besides, saving the Earth by reducing air pollution is one of the benefits of building a subway. To illustrate, when people are keen on taking trains to travel, it can reduce the carbon monoxide emissions from cars. Carbon monoxide emissions can facilitate global warming to our Mother Earth. Due to air pollution, it can reduce the life expectancy of people as the toxic air quality endangers our health. Moreover, spending citizen's taxes on railways can cut down the percentage of accidents happen on the road. For example, according to the news, traffic accidents have been increasing year by year as the enhancement of using automobiles. Therefore, taking trains can increase the possibility of life expectancy and life satisfaction of the public.
In conclusion, with all the new advances and innovations in this modern era, the government should choose the smart expenditure to maintain a safe and healthy life for the citizens.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 753, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cy and life satisfaction of the public. In conclusion, with all the new advances...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, if, moreover, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 1.00243902439 1097% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 965.302439024 155% => OK
No of words: 283.0 196.424390244 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27561837456 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91534210997 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 106.607317073 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554770318021 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 283.868780488 164% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.4498330292 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5333333333 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8666666667 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157471098738 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567663018498 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725113085125 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124381386401 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0817761540366 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 40.7170731707 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.