In the modern world, there are two prominent mode of transport that is roads and railways which are more important for every humans. It is common notion that governmental bodies should squander more on rail transport than roadways. Because tarin transportation provides better facilities and also it is crucial for expansion of economics growth of the country. As far as my concerns, I totally agree with the notion that government should more focusing on development of railway infrastructural facilities than road due to various reasons. In this essay will discuss why spending on railways are significant than roads and will conclude this with clear opinion.
Why expansion of railways are more considerable than road transport? There are several benefits by development of train facilities. Firstly, it is cheaper mode of commuting and therefore it is play a pivotal role for the lower and upper middle class sectoral travel segment. In addition to this, railways contributes to major proportion in GDP through employment generation and frieght collection. In India, recent research about the growth of country shows that 55% of employment opportunities has increased due to the expansion of railway system. In addition to these, the social cost in terms of environmental damage or degradation are significantly lower in rail than other mode of transport. Adding to transparency will also help on assessing the profitability and contribution towards development on the whole.
It is undeniable fact that road needs less investment as compare to train transport and it enables door to door services. However, inspite of these merits, road transportation has some major limitations. First of all, road transport are unstable and unequal, and casualties are more due to the road accidents which is a major drawbacks. In China, for instance, the road accidents survey shows 45% of serious injuries occure by road accidents and over 30% were met death due to the same. Another demerits of it is, in modern times road transportation system has negative impact on environment. Building the road require melting of tar or formulation of concrete, which may harm the associated environment. Moreover, emissions from vehicles are not only have an adverse effects on human health, it is a serious threat to global warming.
To conclude the essay, we have discussed why train transportation are more beneficial and government should more focus on it than roadways. In my opinion, I totally agree with this that government must determined to railway infrastructural development in oreder to expand economic growth and enhancement of climate conditions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 46, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'modes'?
Suggestion: modes
...e modern world, there are two prominent mode of transport that is roads and railways...
^^^^
Line 1, column 46, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'mode' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'modes'.
Suggestion: modes
...e modern world, there are two prominent mode of transport that is roads and railways...
^^^^
Line 2, column 549, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...due to the expansion of railway system. In addition to these, the social cost in t...
^^
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'drawback'?
Suggestion: drawback
... to the road accidents which is a major drawbacks. In China, for instance, the road accid...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 768, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...m vehicles are not only have an adverse effects on human health, it is a serious threat...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, first of all, in my opinion, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 7.0 286% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 5.60731707317 464% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 33.7804878049 178% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 3.97073170732 680% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2230.0 965.302439024 231% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 417.0 196.424390244 212% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34772182254 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 3.73543355544 121% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07175055609 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 106.607317073 204% => Less unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520383693046 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 685.8 283.868780488 242% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 8.94146341463 235% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3768470133 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.19047619 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 3.70975609756 297% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149869111786 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478367131121 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656025380688 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118613205423 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0847394262867 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 40.7170731707 297% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.