The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
The illustration provides us with information in regards to the fuel consumption in the USA, starting from 1980 to 2012, a projection is then made to 2030. As shown, petrol and oil were used extensively throughout the USA with 35q units in 1980 and rising to 42q units in 2012.
Despite initial fluctuations between 1980 to 1994, petrol and oil consumption has been steadily rising since 1995 and is expected to hit 47q in 2030. Coal and natural gas, however, are neck to neck, both initiating at 20q and 15q respectively in 1980. Both met at an equal rate between the years 1985 and 1990 after gas took a minor dip while coal increased gradually. Both have been fluctuating from 1990 till 2016, and experts predict coal will hit 45q in the year 2030 while gas will plateau at 23q.
Furthermore, nuclear, solar/wind and hydrothermal started as equals at 3q. Nuclear and solar/wind rose gradually to 6q and 4q respectively in 2010 while hydropower rose and fell back to 3q and is expected to remain stagnant till 2030. Nuclear and solar/wind, however, will likely increase gradually till the year 2030.
In conclusion, the USA will most likely continue relying on fossil fuels until the distant future with little attention given to sustainable energy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 47, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...lustration provides us with information in regards to the fuel consumption in the USA, starti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, so, then, while, as to, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1057.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96244131455 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69850562296 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600938967136 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.7243798889 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.7 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19357555949 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0781327525524 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0873744922939 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118604742054 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.086428013939 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.