The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the year.
The table depicts the total figures of people who visited Ashdown Museum before and after renovation, the pie charts, however, illustrate the visitor satisfaction to Ashdown Museum throughout the two periods.
Overall, the year after refurbishment saw an influx of visitors as visitors were satisfied with their visit. Prior to the renovation, the majority of visitors were dissatisfied with their stay.
The number of visitors before the refurbishment totaled to 74,000 people. Dissatisfaction was the major vote amongst the visitors who made up about two-fifths during their visit. Just under a third of those were satisfied, whereas only 15% of the visitor claimed that they were very satisfied with their time. One in ten people indicated that they were very dissatisfied before the renovation. Five percent of the people did not respond to the survey.
An additional 18,000 people visited the museum after the renovations were completed. 40% of the visitors were happy with their visit. The number of very satisfied people had increased to just over a third. Likewise, dissatisfied visitors had shrunk by one quarter. A small number of people chose to not respond to the survey as well as for much dissatisfaction with the renovated museum.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 266, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: A few; Some
...ied visitors had shrunk by one quarter. A small number of people chose to not respond to the surv...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, likewise, third, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1065.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35175879397 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82570280613 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517587939698 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6098481075 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.9230769231 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3076923077 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84615384615 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3931723125 0.215688989381 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141899473986 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0839379269333 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24963953679 0.15604864568 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595841590592 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.