The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
The graph illustrates the consumption of energy by fuel in America since 1980 and predictions towards 2030.
Overall, petrol and oil and coal showed a steady but significant rise throughout the period. Despite fluctuations, natural gas, nuclear and solar and wind energy consumptions experienced a gradually increase, whereas hydropower showed a downward trend.
In 1980, the consumption of petrol and oil were started at 35q and had some fluctuations and it fluctuated during the twenty-year period and predicted it will hit the highest point about 50q in 2030. Meanwhile, coal and natural gas initially were at 15q and 20q, respectively. However, coal increased sharply and exceeding the natural gas’ rate in 2015 and a steady increase is forecasted in these two kinds of energy to around 25q in 2030.
The consumption of nuclear and solar or wind have a similar pattern trend in the USA. Both started at about 4q and a moderate increased is predicted to about 7q in the year 2030. In the meantime, hydropower energy experienced some fluctuations from 4q in 1980 and hit a low to almost 2q in 2015 and will remain steady to 2030.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('gradually') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...nd wind energy consumptions experienced a gradually increase, whereas hydropower showed a downward t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 6.8 279% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 965.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07894736842 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92341772437 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536842105263 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4568048294 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.222222222 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215735176425 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0936252675794 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808288890396 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157782471956 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0919488578438 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.