In the modern world, there are two prominent mode of transport that is roads and railways which are more important for every humans. It is common notion that governmental bodies should squander more on rail transport than roadways. Because tarin transportation provides better facilities and also it is crucial for expansion of economics growth of the country. As far as my concerns, I totally agree with the notion that government should more focusing on development of railway infrastructural facilities than road due to various reasons. In this essay will discuss why spending on railways are significant than roads and will conclude this with clear opinion.
Why expansion of railways are more considerable than road transport? There are several benefits by development of train facilities. Firstly, it is cheaper mode of commuting and therefore it is play a pivotal role for the lower and upper middle class sectoral travel segment. In addition to this, railways contributes to major proportion in GDP through employment generation and frieght collection. In India, recent research about the growth of country shows that 55% of employment opportunities has increased due to the expansion of railway system. In addition to these, the social cost in terms of environmental damage or degradation are significantly lower in rail than other mode of transport. Adding to transparency will also help on assessing the profitability and contribution towards development on the whole.
It is undeniable fact that road needs less investment as compare to train transport and it enables door to door services. However, inspite of these merits, road transportation has some major limitations. First of all, road transport are unstable and unequal, and casualties are more due to the road accidents which is a major drawbacks. In China, for instance, the road accidents survey shows 45% of serious injuries occure by road accidents and over 30% were met death due to the same. Another demerits of it is, in modern times road transportation system has negative impact on environment. Building the road require melting of tar or formulation of concrete, which may harm the associated environment. Moreover, emissions from vehicles are not only have an adverse effects on human health, it is a serious threat to global warming.
To conclude the essay, we have discussed why train transportation are more beneficial and government should more focus on it than roadways. In my opinion, I totally agree with this that government must determined to railway infrastructural development in oreder to expand economic growth and enhancement of climate conditions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 46, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'modes'?
Suggestion: modes
...e modern world, there are two prominent mode of transport that is roads and railways...
^^^^
Line 1, column 46, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'mode' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'modes'.
Suggestion: modes
...e modern world, there are two prominent mode of transport that is roads and railways...
^^^^
Line 2, column 549, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...due to the expansion of railway system. In addition to these, the social cost in t...
^^
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'drawback'?
Suggestion: drawback
... to the road accidents which is a major drawbacks. In China, for instance, the road accid...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 768, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...m vehicles are not only have an adverse effects on human health, it is a serious threat...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, first of all, in my opinion, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 8.3376753507 324% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2230.0 1615.20841683 138% => OK
No of words: 417.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34772182254 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07175055609 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520383693046 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 685.8 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3768470133 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.19047619 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149869111786 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478367131121 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656025380688 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118613205423 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0847394262867 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.