Schools concentrate far too much on traditional subjects which do not adequately prepare students for the realistic demands of the modern working world. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

At present era, traditional subjects are taught more than the other subjects without thinking about the necessities in future. so, I completely agree with the statement that rather than focusing on the only course of the traditional curriculum, every educational institute must have to emphasize other streams subjects.

Every student has different prospectives and varied taste of interest in the study. Therefore, the traditional course is not the solution for all the students. School should be more flexible and educational programs should be framed more closely to students individual devoir. A student who wants to be an artist has little need for mathematics or science. For example, likewise, a student who wants to become an engineer would have less requirement for art and biology. When student focusing more on their own subjects, they will excel in those particular subjects.

Also, important learning is missing from a course of traditional studies. The most significant things in our modern world are technology like the computer, internet and other electronic resources. Although the students have the quality to expand their views on these particular subjects if the school doesn't have the courses like smart technology that student is on disadvantage. Likewise, to succeed in any field in the modern world we must be very skilled in our personal interaction and cooperation with others, and most leave school with no skills in this area and must work them out quickly in their first job.

To conclude this essay, for school to produce the students that are able to meet the demand of the working world today, some changes are clearly necessary. I believe if the school develop skills of other activities or subjects and made more particular their syllabus, students would benefit greatly.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... without thinking about the necessities in future. so, I completely agree with the statem...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...inking about the necessities in future. so, I completely agree with the statement ...
^^
Line 5, column 302, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...these particular subjects if the school doesnt have the courses like smart technology ...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, likewise, so, therefore, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28027681661 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72406039263 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560553633218 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1868301412 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78571428571 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196564624275 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685948357235 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0339779329049 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12235133691 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332095878416 0.056905535591 58% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.