Some people believe that it is good to share as much as information as possible in scientific research, business and academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too invaluable to be shared freely.Discuss both views and five yo

Information sharing among people acknowledge them instill in depth conceptual framework or vision. Some people opine that spreading too much information such as scientific studies, businesses life skills and technical and operational knowledge is crucial. Whereas others gives contrast views to these, that some information should be confidential and should not ne solicited without pay in order to prevent it from misappropriation. In this essay will discuss both the views and will give nest conclusion from my point of view.
Why allocation of information is crucial? Because spreading information is not only source to become familiar with new invention or studies, but also helpful to apply practically in everyone's life. In poor villages, for example, in past medicine for disease such as cancer was not possible to get easily,but due to the technological breakthrough the remedies to cure cancer is available widely on the internet. Another reason why information is essential in context of business world. By providing elementary details about the products that company will launch in sooner time is help to consumer awareness and also gives overview of the products and its utilisation. For example, by promoting baby products in company called Himalaya does advertising before launching baby cosmetics and thus the effectiveness of such information is useful for the mothers.
Sharing information is Good but why not every single information is not for the public? And thus to share it is prohibited? There are several significant factors which affect adversely if such information may spread towards the general public. Firstly, scientific studies such as atomic energy invention and nuclear weapons or biological warfare should not be share among the people due to the misleading of such information. As we look back in history the good example of negative use of atoms was Hiroshima and Nagasaki, millions of lost their lives and thousand of suffered from life long disease until today. Secondly, if we look at corporate sector, the information contained personal principles of the company should not disseminate to other sectors due to the competitiveness. Thus, Some serious information should not distribute among the others.
To conclude the essay, sharing information about general life skills or studies that may beneficial to the public is necessary but not the information who has threats for the lives of earth. In my opinion, I think information is necessary, but not the cost of harmful to others

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 115, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...not only source to become familiar with new invention or studies, but also helpful to apply p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 303, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , but
...as cancer was not possible to get easily,but due to the technological breakthrough t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 228, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...such information may spread towards the general public. Firstly, scientific studies such as at...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 556, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...asaki, millions of lost their lives and thousand of suffered from life long disease unti...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, still, thus, whereas, for example, i think, such as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2128.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 396.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37373737374 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98695852541 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550505050505 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 673.2 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8379127602 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8421052632 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84210526316 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290296607096 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0947329620486 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631583096369 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182526330779 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0824484083349 0.056905535591 145% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.