The graph and chart below give information about 3D cinema screens and film release. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
The graph compares and contrasts data on the changes in number of digital 3D screens around the world whereas the chart represents the quantity of cinema releases in two types, namely live action and animation. Overall, as can be seen from the graph and chart, the production of digital 3D screens and directed films significantly increased between 2005 and 2011.
First of all, having looked at the graph, it should be acknowledged that in 2005 the quantity of digital screens was diminutive almost zero but during the 3 year period there was a slight increase which was followed by a massive growth. In 2009 the number of screens was equal to 10000 and during the next two years has sharply increased and reached the mark which accounted for 40000.
It is clearly shown that between 2005 and 2007 only animation films were produced and the number of them was limited. 2008 saw the first appearance of live action films and until 2011 there were much more animation films than live action. By 2012 the combined number of films reached over 75 and the number of animation approximately was approximately equal to 26 which was almost a half of live action films.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 365, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cantly increased between 2005 and 2011. First of all, having looked at the graph...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, whereas, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 965.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80099502488 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44895412423 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55223880597 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.1919350141 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.857142857 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7142857143 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120342105218 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0646727789761 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052500815415 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0934039814371 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0720491962418 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 365, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cantly increased between 2005 and 2011. First of all, having looked at the graph...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, whereas, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 965.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80099502488 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44895412423 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55223880597 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.1919350141 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.857142857 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7142857143 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120342105218 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0646727789761 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052500815415 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0934039814371 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0720491962418 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.