The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feautures, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart compares and contrasts data on the changes in the number of created and used electricity in the top ten countries in 2014. Overall ,as can be seen , only two countries from whole list have massive numbers in electricity manufacture and intake, whereas the rest countries have approximately similar marks.
First of all, after having looked at the bar chart, is should be noted that China has major numbers in production and consumption of electricity (5,398 billion kWh and 5,322 billion kWh respectively) and this marks are almost identical. In addition to this, the similar situation can be observed in United States, but the quantity of created electricity was equal to 4,099 billion and the number of utitlized electrical energy totaled 3,866 billion.
Next, Russia leads the rest of the nations,with 1,057 in production and 1,038 in consumption, which was followed by Japan. Indial was located in the middle of the list having 871 billion kWh in electricity manufacture and 698,8 billion kWh in electricity expenditure. Canada and France ranked 6th and 7th, where the numbers of two proccesses related with energy were slighty bigger in Canada than in India. Finally, the last three spots were Brazil (530,7 and 455,8 billion kWh), Germany, which is only one country where the number of comsuming electricity is larger the quantity of manufactured electricity, and Korea producing 485,1 billion and consuming 449,5 billion kWh.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...n the top ten countries in 2014. Overall ,as can be seen , only two countries from...
^^
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...untries in 2014. Overall ,as can be seen , only two countries from whole list have...
^^
Line 2, column 53, Rule ID: IS_SHOULD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'it'?
Suggestion: it
..., after having looked at the bar chart, is should be noted that China has major nu...
^^
Line 3, column 43, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , with
...xt, Russia leads the rest of the nations,with 1,057 in production and 1,038 in consum...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, look, whereas, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1211.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1974248927 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74028943871 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583690987124 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 359.1 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.6120890006 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.375 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.125 22.9334400587 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149979577573 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782486553809 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0702030022399 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116484656338 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048349573974 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.2329268293 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.