The diagram below illustrates how fossils were exposed beneath a cliff as a result of coastal erosion.
The diagram represents an outcome of the influence of coastal erosion on a cliff and how it leads to the exposure of fossils. Overall, as can be seen from the picture, during the time the size of the rock gradually reduces due to the effect of waves and high and low tides.
First of all, after having looked at the diagram, it should be acknowledged that high tides attack the bottom part of the cliff and this main reason why the hollow part is often evident at the foot of the cliff. In addition to this, waves beat the cliff at half of its height and accelerate the erosion process.
After a time, as the bottom part of the cliff slightly disappears there is no support for the cliff's upper part. Therefore, rocks from the top part fall down creating a sloping rocky platform.The sea-front bottom cliff’s part is always being damaged by waves which leads to the emergence of the danger zone. Under the pressure of sea water the cliff’s surface retreated many times before the exploration of fossils.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 193, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... down creating a sloping rocky platform.The sea-front bottom cliff’s part is always...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, so, therefore, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 832.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62222222222 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36828322464 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1016658881 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.857142857 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 5.23603664747 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154965112474 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842564902575 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0800200085421 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112310951052 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353023582769 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.